03460nas a2200421   4500008004100000020001400041245008300055210006900138260004000207300001200247490000700259520218800266653001502454653002602469653001902495653001302514653002902527653001602556653001602572653003002588653001602618653002602634653001502660653002302675653002402698653002202722653001502744653001102759653002302770653001702793653002202810653001902832653001302851653001402864100002202878700002202900856011602922       1996                        eng d  a0024-116400aSponge borehole size as a relative measure of bioerosion and paleoproductivity0 aSponge borehole size as a relative measure of bioerosion and pal  aOSLObSCANDINAVIAN UNIVERSITY PRESS  a275-2860 v293 aBioerosion intensity has been proposed as a measure of paleoproductivity in fossil reefs, but it is difficult to measure directly because fossil corals are often incomplete and because it is difficult to infer the length of time a given coral was exposed to bioeroding organisms. Both nutrient availability and taphonomic factors can affect bioerosion intensity as measured in dead corals. Here, we examine these two effects separately using data from previous studies on bioerosion in modern and fossil corals. Size of individual sponge borings accurately reflects total bioerosion in modern massive and branching corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Total bioerosion in both massive and branching corals decreases outward across the continental shelf, paralleling trends in nutrient availability. Size of individual Cliothosa hancocki borings decreases across the shelf in branching Acropora but not in massive Porites. Fossil sponge borings Entobia convoluta and Uniglobites glomerata in massive corals from Oligocene and Miocene reefs in Puerto Rico are smallest in Oligocene shelf-edge reefs, intermediate in Oligocene patch reefs, and largest in Miocene patch reefs. Both facies-related influence, represented by Oligocene shelf-edge reefs vs. Oligocene patch reefs, and nutrient-related influence, represented by Oligocene vs. Miocene patch reefs, were reflected in the size of sponge boreholes. Size of sponge borings also varies among species of host corals, apparently in relation to skeletal architecture. Borehole size is inversely correlated with skeletal density as measured by the relative proportion of skeleton and pore space in transverse thin section. There is a weak positive correlation between borehole size and corallite diameter. These findings contradict reported positive correlations between total bioerosion and bulk density in modern corals. Borehole size appears accurately to reflect intensity of total internal bioerosion in fossil corals. Facies-controlled taphonomic overprints and influence of skeletal differences between coral species limit the use of sponge borehole size to a rough indicator of paleoproductivity in fossil coral reef environments.10abioerosion10abiological production10aBoring sponges10aCenozoic10aCONTINENTAL-SHELF TRENDS10acoral reefs10aCORAL-REEFS10aDAMSELFISH TERRITORIALITY10aDEAD CORALS10aDELTA-C-13 EXCURSIONS10aEXTINCTION10aGREAT-BARRIER-REEF10aINTERNAL BIOEROSION10aK TE PALEONTOLOGY10aLITHOPHAGA10aMarine10apalaeoenvironments10aPALEONTOLOGY10aPaleoproductivity10aPHOSPHOGENESIS10aPorifera10aTaphonomy1 aEdinger, Evan, N.1 aRisk, Michael, J.  uhttps://reefichno.myspecies.info/content/sponge-borehole-size-relative-measure-bioerosion-and-paleoproductivity